Artistic Female Photography
Female Amateur Photography
Female Body Photography
Female Fashion Photography
Female Figure Photography
Female Form Photography
Female Glamour Photography
Female Lifestyle Photography
Female Male Photography
Female Model Photography
Female Photography
Female Physique Photography
Female Portrait Photography
Vintage Female Photography


Contact Us
Privacy Policy



Female Photography

Female photography is both an art and a science according to some. But, they are wrong. Female photography including photos of women is purely a science of pleasing pictures as there is no art to it. Now, this idea of female pictures may go against all common sense, reason and intuition, but who needs those things anyway?

Store and Organize Your Photos!
Store photos and videos with gorgeous slideshows. Free 14 day trial!

Female photography is a science, pure and simple. You set the girl or woman on a chair, adjust the lighting, take meter readings and when the numbers are perfect, you pop the flash and take female pictures again and again until you're lucky enough to get something usable. Capturing captivating women in photos is more luck than anything else.

The science of female photography dictates that because of the laws of probability, the more photos one takes of the subject, the more likely it is that a usable picture will occur.

Critics will argue that female photography is an art because of the subjectivity of framing, focus, cropping, lighting, color, film choice and all of the other decisions that go into making a pleasing portrait. All of this, of course if poppycock.

Others would argue this is merely balderdash that only rises to the level of being poppycock if provoked and encouraged. Now, let's be reasonable a moment and just entertain the concept of female photography as an art instead of a science.

Was the Mona Lisa a photograph? No. Was Venus de Milo a photo? No. Was Whistler's Mother a silver halide picture? No. So, let's recap. The most famous women in art of all time have nothing to do with females in photography.

Female photography is thus a science and not an art. Case closed. If you'd like to reopen the case then do so at your own peril. The case already stated is pretty strong and will hold up in court in at least 13 states and the commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

In order to present your case that female photography is indeed an art form and women in photos is simply a sub-genre, then your attorney will have to present three letters of recommendation from an accredited college in Switzerland, two forms of identification sanctioned by the Homeland Security council and one very large bribe approved by the Commissioner of Baseball.

A few illicit steroids in a plain white envelop wouldn't hurt the case either. In fact, photos of this substance will also be valued as well.

So, let's recap what we already know about female pictures. First you put the girl on a chair, then adjust the lighting and finally, click the shutter button on the camera. It matters not whether one has a high end digital camera or a low end throw away camera. What matters most in female photography is actually the female subject that is chosen. Women in photos do not choose themselves and that is why we must do so.

Choose a hot babe to photograph and who cares if the lense isn't tack sharp? Choose Hulga the broom lady and viewers will beg for the pictures to be a little fuzzy.

If you've not guessed already this site is filled with all sorts of humorous information and insight regarding female photography and women in photos is not to be taken seriously in the least (or in the most). Those who do take this site seriously will be reprimanded by a special committee of Congress. You don't want that now do you?
















  COPYRIGHT 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Female-Photography.com